About the ICTY

Exhibit showing inmates of a Serb-run detention camp

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was created by the United Nations court of law dealing with war crimes that took place during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990’s to provide victims an opportunity to voice the horrors they witnessed and experienced.

In its precedent-setting decisions on genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, the Tribunal has shown that an individual’s senior position can no longer protect them from prosecution.

It has now shown that those suspected of bearing the greatest responsibility for atrocities committed can be called to account, as well as that guilt should be individualised, protecting entire communities from being labelled as “collectively responsible”.

The Tribunal has laid the foundations for what is now the accepted norm for conflict resolution and post-conflict development across the globe, specifically that leaders suspected of mass crimes will face justice. The Tribunal has proved that efficient and transparent international justice is possible.

The Tribunal has contributed to an indisputable historical record, combating denial and helping communities come to terms with their recent history. Crimes across the region can no longer be denied. For example, it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that the mass murder at Srebrenica was genocide.

Judges have also ruled that rape was used by members of the Bosnian Serb armed forces as an instrument of terror, and the judges in the Kvočka et al. trial established that a “hellish orgy of persecution” occurred in the Omarska, Keraterm and Trnopolje camps of northwestern Bosnia.

While the most significant number of cases heard at the Tribunal have dealt with alleged crimes committed by Serbs and Bosnian Serbs, the Tribunal has investigated and brought charges against persons from every ethnic background. Convictions have been secured against Croats, as well as both Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Albanians for crimes committed against Serbs and others.

While its judgements demonstrate that all parties in the conflicts committed crimes, the Tribunal regards its fairness and impartiality to be of paramount importance. It takes no side in the conflict and does not attempt to create any artificial balance between different groups. Evidence is the basis upon which the Prosecution presents a case. The Judges ensure a fair and open trial, assessing the evidence to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.

Established as an ad hoc court, the Security Council endorsed the Tribunal’s completion strategy for a staggered and ordered closure. Estimates as of November 2010 suggest that of the ten cases in the trial or pre-trial stage, four will be concluded in 2011, and five are anticipated to conclude in 2012. The case of Radovan Karadžić is expected to finish at the end of 2013.  All appeals are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2014, although the recent, unavoidable delays in the Karadžić case suggest that this date will have to be re-assessed at an appropriate time.

Since 2003 the court has worked closely with local judiciaries and courts in the former Yugoslavia, working in partnership as part of a continuing effort to see justice served.

Undoubtedly, the Tribunal’s work has had a major impact on the states of the former Yugoslavia. Simply by removing some of the most senior and notorious criminals and holding them accountable the Tribunal has been able to lift the taint of violence, contribute to ending impunity and help pave the way for reconciliation.

Establishment

In May 1993, the Tribunal was established by the United Nations in response to mass atrocities then taking place in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Reports depicting horrendous crimes, in which thousands of civilians were being killed and wounded, tortured and sexually abused in detention camps and hundreds of thousands expelled from their homes, caused outrage across the world and spurred the UN Security Council to act.

The ICTY was the first war crimes court created by the UN and the first international war crimes tribunal since the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals. It was established by the Security Council in accordance with Chapter VII of the UN Charter.

The key objective of the ICTY is to try those individuals most responsible for appalling acts such as murder, torture, rape, enslavement, destruction of property and other crimes listed in the Tribunal’s Statute. By bringing perpetrators to trial, the ICTY aims to deter future crimes and render justice to thousands of victims and their families, thus contributing to a lasting peace in the former Yugoslavia.

Situated in The Hague, the Netherlands, the ICTY has charged over 160 persons. Those indicted by the ICTY include heads of state, prime ministers, army chiefs-of-staff, interior ministers and many other high- and mid-level political, military and police leaders from various parties to the Yugoslav conflicts. Its indictments address crimes committed from 1991 to 2001 against members of various ethnic groups in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Kosovo and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. More than 60 individuals have been convicted and currently more than 40 people are in different stages of proceedings before the Tribunal.

Those interested in the Tribunal’s proceedings can visit the ICTY and watch trials first-hand. Trials can also be followed through the internet broadcast on this website.

While operating at full capacity, the Tribunal is working towards the completion of its mandate. The ICTY aims to achieve this by concentrating on the prosecution and trial of the most senior leaders, while referring a certain number of cases involving intermediate and lower-ranking accused to national courts in the former Yugoslavia. This plan, commonly referred to as the Tribunal’s ‘completion strategy’, foresees the Tribunal assisting in strengthening the capacity of national courts in the region to handle war crimes cases.

The ICTY is made up of three main branches: the Chambers, the Registry, and the Office of the Prosecutor.

2 responses

  1. By publishing the Havib photograph it seems that you’re not necessarily the apologist for Greatere Serbia atrocities you seem to be from your defence of the Civikov book. You accept that the ICTY has removed some of the most senior and notorious criminals and held them accountable and in so doing has contributed to ending impunity. It would be advisable if you made your position rather clearer. Perhaps you are simply someone who isn’t closely acquainted with the issues, but in that case you should not make out that you speak for the victims in the way that the title of your blog suggests.

    • I’m sorry, what “the Havib photograph” are you talking about? I’m not defending Civikov book at all, but that doesn’t mean that I won’t be posting reviews about it (or any other book for that matter). I want people to read about the Srebrenica Genocide and most importantly, I want them “not to forget” about it. EVER!
      I am VERY MUCH acquainted with the issues regarding Bosnian War because I AM Bosnian! I know “I don’t know” much about what’s REALLY going on inside The Tribunal but I want to. I want to know so badly why Erdemovic got 3 1/2 years only and I’m NOT HAPPY with some of the ICTY judges at all. Don’t think I’m happy with Civikov’s answer, ’cause I’m not, but I’ll keep reading everything that comes my way, asking questions and blogging… At this time, that’s all I can do BUT I do hope all of you who know more than I, will share it here on this blog.
      Thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s